This morning I read a piece in Harvard Business Review â the apex of thoughtful, measured, data-rich corporate discourse â titled âWhatâs the Future of Middle Management?â Spoiler: It's not extinction. The authors make a reasonable case: middle managers are still vital because of their unique position in the organizational food chain. But â and it's a big but â to stay relevant, they need to shrink in numbers and evolve in function. Less compliance cop, more talent developer. Less command-and-control, more coach-and-collaborator. They're supposed to foster creativity, protect frontline teams from top-down lunacy, and facilitate upskilling. My take? Feels good. Sounds right. Doesnât hold.Letâs unpack the problems â there are few. 1. More middle, not lessThe authors open with a stat that torpedoes their own narrative: the proportion of middle managers has increased over the last 40 years â from 9% in 1983 to 13% in 2022. Thatâs not fewer middle managers. That is more. Way more. Bottom line? Just because the middle is swelling doesnât mean itâs necessary. It means itâs bloated. 2. You canât coach with a whistle and a gunThe authors suggest turning managers into coaches. Sure. And letâs turn police officers into yoga instructors while weâre at it. Newsflash: slapping a whistle on someone with formal power doesnât make them a coach â it makes them a boss pretending to play nice. Hierarchies donât produce empathy, they enforce compliance. Expecting non-hierarchical behavior in a hierarchical system is like expecting dogs to meow. As the great philosopher Gino DâAcampo once said when told his dish was "British carbonara": âIf my grandmother had wheels, she would have been a bike.â Bottom line? You canât expect human beings to behave in ways the structure doesnât promote - or allow. 3. Middle management as moral shield?Please. Another gem: middle managers should protect frontline workers from executives. Translation: the adults upstairs need other adults to babysit the kids downstairs. Thatâs pure paternalism, repackaged as âsupport.â This is the unspoken moral contract in traditional hierarchy: top-down control in exchange for top-down protection. Daddy makes the rules, but Daddy will also keep you safe. Grow up. Bottom line? Adults donât need protection. They need power. Dismantle the hierarchy and treat people like peers â not children. 4. Same old case studies, same old fear.GitHub. Valve. Zappos. The tired trio of âflatter orgs gone wrongâ is wheeled out like ghost stories at corporate campfires. Yes, there were failures. No, they werenât the whole story. What these cautionary tales ignore: the dozens â hundreds â of organizations thriving with self-management, radical transparency, and decentralized teams. Weâve seen them. Weâve worked with them. In fact, weâve designed an intensive 6-week masterclass around them. Theyâre not theoretical â theyâre real, they scale, and they work. Bottom line? Cherry-picking failure stories doesnât prove the model is broken. It proves your bias. On to the nextThat is enough middle manager bashing for today. Letâs talk solutions. Last year, we nominated 50 progressive organizations for the Zero Distance Awards â an initiative by Thinkers50, Gary Hamelâs MLab, and Haierâs HMI. The goal? Celebrate organizations that are killing the middle (management), cutting the friction, and moving power to the people who actually serve customers. They call it Zero Distance â the idea that the best companies minimize the gap between employees and customers. The principles:
In short: fewer managers, more momentum. Weâre now scouting for this yearâs nominees. If your company:
⊠we want to hear from you. Hereâs what weâll do:
Reply to this email to set up a conversation â or just send us a few lines about what you're doing. P.S. This yearâs awards will take place in Qingdao, China, this September. Invite-only. If youâre nominated and want in, weâll get you a seat at the table. Letâs make sure the Corporate Rebels crew shows up strong. Updates from Corporate Rebels HQHere's a quick overview of everything happening at Corporate Rebels:
New articleA new article has been published on our blog earlier this week:
What inspired usHere's something noteworthy we discovered this past week that youâre going to love:
âManagement is good for maintenance mode, but itâs not good for innovation and adaptation.
â
Moreover, management is bad for people.
â
It limits creativity, it curtails freedom, and itâs essentially coercive.â
Translation: Traditional management is a drag on talent, a brake on innovation, and a relic of the industrial age. Time to upgrade the OS. Cheers, Follow us on: |
Join 40,900+ changemakers from all corners of the globe. We share insights on self-managing organizations, new ways of working, and global pioneering companies. Every other week: blog on Monday, newsletter on Thursday. Are you up for some fun, inspiring and rebellious content? Become part of the workplace revolution! đ
It was hot, loud, and late in SĂŁo Paulo. We had just arrived, jet-lagged and buzzing with questions, about to meet one of the most iconic figures in the world of radical work design. The restaurant was sharpâwhite tablecloths, waiters with straight backs, and Ricardo Semler at the center of it all. He spoke with fire. Ideas about trust, freedom, decentralization, democracy at work. His vision was bold, clean, and intoxicating. But it wasnât until laterâhours later, in a quiet living room...
Hi Reader, One of my highlights every year? The 6-week masterclasses we run a few times annually. In each masterclass, we guide a cohort of about 30 practitioners through how to move their organizations beyond hierarchy. Itâs a deep dive into progressive organizational designâtopped off with hands-on work transforming their own organizations. No more layers of bureaucracy, no more sluggish decision-making, no more command-and-control nonsense. Just real tools for building better ways of...
Ever since we ditched our corporate jobs and kicked off Corporate Rebels, weâve been on a mission: end the frustration and inefficiencies of traditional management. We knew (or letâs be honest, hoped) to turn Corporate Rebels into a global movement. And âmovementâ is the word we used from day one. But truth is, we werenât a movement. Not yet. We were a team of workplace geeks with a big audience. Powerful? Sure. But not nearly as powerful as a true movement can be. So, 14 months ago, with...