β In preparing for the summer '25 cohort of our Corporate Rebels Masterclass, I had conversations with two founders of wildly successful self-managing organizations. Both run companies without traditional hierarchies. Because both believe in autonomy, trust, and ditching command-and-control. But when I asked them how decisions are made, I got two completely different answers. One said: "We like to reach consensus. We only move forward when everyone agrees. It's part of our culture to find the best solutions together, not just pushing something through." The other said: "One of the biggest mistakes in implementing self-management is associating it with consensus. Consensus slows things down and creates obstacles. Effective self-management doesn't require everyone to agree." Same concept. Same vocabulary. Completely opposite take. It reminded me of Leo Tolstoy. Yes, it might sound odd to invoke a 19th-century Russian aristocrat in a conversation about modern-day management. But stay with me. Tolstoy once wrote: "The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already." Translation? Ignorance isn't the problem. Certainty is. What people think self-management isIf you want to see certainty masquerading as insight, just drop the term self-management into a room full of corporate types. Watch what happens. You'll get the usual reflexes:
Not because they're clueless. But because they think they already understand it. And what they understand is either wrong, or dangerously incomplete. Because self-management isn't just a new operating model. It's a new lens. It redefines how we think about work, authority, trust, and even what an organization is. And that makes people uncomfortable. Especially those who've climbed the ladder and now find themselves staring at a flattened org chart with their title missing. But here's the real kicker: even inside the self-management movement, people are falling into the same trap. When self-management becomes a religionFor some, self-management has become a religion. And every religion has its priesthood. You've seen them:
These frameworks were meant to liberate us from bureaucracy. But increasingly, they're creating new bureaucracies. Just with hipper language and sleeker diagrams. Meanwhile, the people doing the actual work are stuck in a maze of roles, circles, checklists, and tactical meetings. And no one's allowed to say: "This doesn't make any sense." Because questioning the framework is treated like heresy. And when a revolution loses its appetite for doubt, it stops being a revolution. It becomes a religion. Self-management is a journeyLet's be clear: this isn't an anti-Agile rant. It's not a takedown of Holacracy. It's not a swipe at Teal. There's real value in all of them. They're built on principles worth keeping. But here's the truth: Self-management is messy. It's not a product. It's not a process. It's not something you simply "implement." It's a journey. A constant negotiation between autonomy and alignment. Between freedom and responsibility. And if you're not regularly rethinking that balance, then you're not doing self-management. You're just performing a script. Rebellion over religionAt Corporate Rebels, we've walked through enough progressive workplaces to know: the real risk isn't that self-management doesn't work. The risk is that it gets hijacked by people who need it to work in a very specific way, because their identity depends on it. That's why we believe in rebellion, not religion. So next time someone stands up and says, with absolute confidence: "This is how self-management is suppose to work." Ask yourself: Have they doubted? Listened? Changed their mind recently? Or are they just another priest in a new kind of church? If this resonated with you. And you're eager to explore what self-management actually looks like in practice. Consider joining our 6-week Corporate Rebels Masterclass. We're currently in the middle of our summer cohort, where participants from around the world are challenging dogma, unlearning bureaucracy, and diving into real-life examples of progressive work. The next opportunity to join will be in the Fall '25 cohort. It's not for the faint of heart. But if you're ready to move beyond theory and into practice, then this is for you. π Check out the Masterclassβ β Cheers, β Follow us on: |
Join 43,900+ changemakers from all corners of the globe. We share insights on self-managing organizations, new ways of working, and global pioneering companies. Every other week: blog on Monday, newsletter on Thursday. Are you up for some fun, inspiring and rebellious content? Become part of the workplace revolution! π
We arrived by boat. Forty impact entrepreneurs. Brought together by Forming Impact, from all corners of the world. The sky was burning blue, the water impossibly clear. And there it was: Necker Island. On the dock stood a man in shorts and flip-flops, waving as we pulled up to the shore. Richard Branson, grinning like a kid on holiday, there to welcome us in person. It was surreal. But also, strangely normal. No security guards. No PR team. Just a curious, kind, slightly sunburned man, ready...
A month ago, white smoke curled from a chimney in Rome. Crowds gathered. News anchors speculated. The world held its breath. A new pope was about to be revealed. But while most waited for the name to be spoken, a small group of researchers from Bocconi University already knew it. Not because of divine prophecy. Because of data. By analyzing the relational structure of the Vaticanβs inner circle (who consulted whom, who trusted whom, who spent time with whom) they predicted the outcome before...
Last week, in a warehouse just outside Barcelona, a plain cardboard box sat on a wooden chair. It wasnβt there for shipping. It was a ballot box. Around it, just under fifty workers gathered. Some in overalls, some in steel-toe boots, many with grease still on their hands. One by one, they stepped forward, slipped in their vote, and returned to their seat. What were they voting on? Whether or not to sell their company to us. Let me explain. Not your average acquisition Our other company,...